# Framework Integrity Protection System ## 🛡️ Overview The Framework Integrity Protection System ensures that Rustelo implementations remain updateable and don't become unmaintainable forks. This system provides mechanisms to: - **Validate implementation compliance** with framework architecture - **Detect unsafe modifications** that break update compatibility - **Guide safe customization** through approved extension points - **Automate integrity checks** during development and deployment - **Provide migration assistance** when framework updates require changes ## 🏗️ Architecture Principles ### 1. Clear Boundaries ``` Framework Core (Protected) │ Implementation Space (Customizable) ├── Core traits and interfaces │ ├── Trait implementations ├── Template system │ ├── Custom components ├── Routing engine │ ├── Content and styling ├── Build system │ ├── Configuration overrides └── Update mechanisms │ └── Feature integrations ``` ### 2. Extension Points Framework provides safe extension points where implementations can customize behavior without breaking updates: - **Trait implementations**: Custom logic through trait system - **Component overrides**: UI components via layered override system - **Configuration layers**: Settings via layered configuration - **Feature additions**: Modular features that compose cleanly - **Content and styling**: Complete customization of presentation ### 3. Forbidden Modifications The system prevents modifications that break update compatibility: - ❌ Direct framework core modifications - ❌ Hardcoded routes or paths bypassing configuration system - ❌ Breaking trait contracts or interfaces - ❌ Circumventing security or safety mechanisms - ❌ Modifying shared build or update infrastructure ## 🔍 Integrity Validation System ### Core Validator Implementation ```rust // crates/foundation/crates/core-lib/src/integrity.rs use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize}; use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet}; use std::path::{Path, PathBuf}; /// Framework integrity validator #[derive(Debug)] pub struct IntegrityValidator { framework_manifest: FrameworkManifest, implementation_root: PathBuf, validation_rules: Vec, } /// Framework manifest defining protected boundaries #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub struct FrameworkManifest { pub version: String, pub protected_paths: Vec, pub required_traits: Vec, pub extension_points: Vec, pub forbidden_patterns: Vec, pub update_compatibility: CompatibilityInfo, } /// Trait requirement for implementations #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub struct TraitRequirement { pub trait_name: String, pub required_methods: Vec, pub implementation_path: String, pub compatibility_version: String, } /// Safe extension point definition #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub struct ExtensionPoint { pub name: String, pub location: String, pub allowed_modifications: Vec, pub validation_schema: Option, pub examples: Vec, } /// Pattern that breaks framework compatibility #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub struct ForbiddenPattern { pub pattern: String, pub reason: String, pub suggested_alternative: String, pub severity: ViolationSeverity, } /// Integrity validation result #[derive(Debug)] pub struct ValidationResult { pub passed: bool, pub violations: Vec, pub warnings: Vec, pub suggestions: Vec, pub compatibility_score: f32, } /// Integrity violation details #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub struct IntegrityViolation { pub severity: ViolationSeverity, pub category: ViolationCategory, pub description: String, pub file_path: String, pub line_number: Option, pub suggested_fix: String, pub breaking_change: bool, } #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub enum ViolationSeverity { Critical, // Breaks updates completely High, // May break future updates Medium, // Best practice violation Low, // Style or performance issue } #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] pub enum ViolationCategory { CoreModification, // Direct framework modification TraitViolation, // Trait contract broken ConfigurationBypass, // Hardcoded values bypassing config SecurityBreach, // Security mechanism bypassed ArchitecturalViolation, // Violates framework architecture DeprecatedUsage, // Uses deprecated APIs } impl IntegrityValidator { /// Create new validator with framework manifest pub fn new(framework_root: &Path, implementation_root: &Path) -> Result { let manifest_path = framework_root.join("FRAMEWORK_MANIFEST.toml"); let framework_manifest = Self::load_manifest(&manifest_path)?; let validation_rules = Self::build_validation_rules(&framework_manifest)?; Ok(Self { framework_manifest, implementation_root: implementation_root.to_path_buf(), validation_rules, }) } /// Run full integrity validation pub fn validate(&self) -> Result { let mut violations = Vec::new(); let mut warnings = Vec::new(); let mut suggestions = Vec::new(); // Check protected paths violations.extend(self.check_protected_paths()?); // Validate trait implementations violations.extend(self.validate_trait_implementations()?); // Check for forbidden patterns violations.extend(self.scan_forbidden_patterns()?); // Validate configuration usage violations.extend(self.validate_configuration_usage()?); // Check extension point usage violations.extend(self.validate_extension_points()?); // Generate improvement suggestions suggestions.extend(self.generate_suggestions(&violations)?); let compatibility_score = self.calculate_compatibility_score(&violations); let passed = violations.iter().all(|v| !matches!(v.severity, ViolationSeverity::Critical)); Ok(ValidationResult { passed, violations, warnings, suggestions, compatibility_score, }) } /// Check if protected framework paths are modified fn check_protected_paths(&self) -> Result, IntegrityError> { let mut violations = Vec::new(); for protected_path in &self.framework_manifest.protected_paths { let full_path = self.implementation_root.join(protected_path); if full_path.exists() { // Check if this is a legitimate override vs unauthorized modification if !self.is_authorized_override(&full_path)? { violations.push(IntegrityViolation { severity: ViolationSeverity::Critical, category: ViolationCategory::CoreModification, description: format!("Unauthorized modification of protected framework path: {}", protected_path), file_path: full_path.to_string_lossy().to_string(), line_number: None, suggested_fix: format!("Remove modifications to {} and use appropriate extension points", protected_path), breaking_change: true, }); } } } Ok(violations) } /// Validate trait implementation compliance fn validate_trait_implementations(&self) -> Result, IntegrityError> { let mut violations = Vec::new(); for trait_req in &self.framework_manifest.required_traits { let impl_path = self.implementation_root.join(&trait_req.implementation_path); if !impl_path.exists() { violations.push(IntegrityViolation { severity: ViolationSeverity::High, category: ViolationCategory::TraitViolation, description: format!("Missing required trait implementation: {}", trait_req.trait_name), file_path: impl_path.to_string_lossy().to_string(), line_number: None, suggested_fix: format!("Implement required trait {} at {}", trait_req.trait_name, trait_req.implementation_path), breaking_change: true, }); continue; } // Validate trait implementation completeness let impl_content = std::fs::read_to_string(&impl_path)?; violations.extend(self.validate_trait_methods(&impl_content, trait_req)?); } Ok(violations) } /// Scan for forbidden patterns that break compatibility fn scan_forbidden_patterns(&self) -> Result, IntegrityError> { let mut violations = Vec::new(); for forbidden in &self.framework_manifest.forbidden_patterns { let pattern_violations = self.scan_pattern(&forbidden.pattern, &forbidden.reason, &forbidden.suggested_alternative, forbidden.severity)?; violations.extend(pattern_violations); } Ok(violations) } /// Calculate compatibility score (0.0 = incompatible, 1.0 = fully compatible) fn calculate_compatibility_score(&self, violations: &[IntegrityViolation]) -> f32 { if violations.is_empty() { return 1.0; } let total_severity_score: f32 = violations.iter() .map(|v| match v.severity { ViolationSeverity::Critical => 10.0, ViolationSeverity::High => 5.0, ViolationSeverity::Medium => 2.0, ViolationSeverity::Low => 0.5, }) .sum(); let max_possible_score = 100.0; // Arbitrary baseline (max_possible_score - total_severity_score).max(0.0) / max_possible_score } } /// Integrity error types #[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)] pub enum IntegrityError { #[error("Framework manifest not found or invalid: {0}")] InvalidManifest(String), #[error("IO error during validation: {0}")] IoError(#[from] std::io::Error), #[error("Parsing error: {0}")] ParseError(String), #[error("Configuration error: {0}")] ConfigurationError(String), } /// Auto-repair capability for common violations impl IntegrityValidator { /// Attempt to automatically fix violations where possible pub fn auto_repair(&self, violations: &[IntegrityViolation]) -> Result { let mut repaired = Vec::new(); let mut failed = Vec::new(); for violation in violations { match self.attempt_repair(violation) { Ok(()) => repaired.push(violation.clone()), Err(e) => failed.push((violation.clone(), e)), } } Ok(RepairResult { repaired, failed }) } /// Attempt to repair a specific violation fn attempt_repair(&self, violation: &IntegrityViolation) -> Result<(), IntegrityError> { match violation.category { ViolationCategory::ConfigurationBypass => { self.repair_configuration_bypass(violation) }, ViolationCategory::DeprecatedUsage => { self.repair_deprecated_usage(violation) }, // Only safe, automated repairs _ => Err(IntegrityError::ConfigurationError( "Manual repair required for this violation type".to_string() )) } } } #[derive(Debug)] pub struct RepairResult { pub repaired: Vec, pub failed: Vec<(IntegrityViolation, IntegrityError)>, } ``` ## 🔧 CLI Integration ### Integrity Commands ```rust // Add to rustelo CLI in main.rs /// Framework integrity protection commands #[derive(Debug, Clap)] pub enum IntegrityCommand { /// Validate framework integrity Validate { /// Path to implementation root #[clap(long, default_value = ".")] path: String, /// Output format (human, json, junit) #[clap(long, default_value = "human")] format: String, /// Fail on warnings #[clap(long)] strict: bool, /// Generate detailed report #[clap(long)] detailed: bool, }, /// Auto-repair violations where possible Repair { /// Path to implementation root #[clap(long, default_value = ".")] path: String, /// Dry run (don't make changes) #[clap(long)] dry_run: bool, /// Only repair specific categories #[clap(long)] categories: Option>, }, /// Show framework compatibility information Compatibility { /// Framework version to check against #[clap(long)] target_version: Option, }, /// Initialize integrity protection for new implementation Init { /// Path to implementation root #[clap(long, default_value = ".")] path: String, /// Enable continuous validation #[clap(long)] continuous: bool, }, } async fn handle_integrity_command(cmd: IntegrityCommand) -> Result<(), CliError> { match cmd { IntegrityCommand::Validate { path, format, strict, detailed } => { validate_integrity(&path, &format, strict, detailed).await }, IntegrityCommand::Repair { path, dry_run, categories } => { repair_violations(&path, dry_run, categories).await }, IntegrityCommand::Compatibility { target_version } => { check_compatibility(target_version.as_deref()).await }, IntegrityCommand::Init { path, continuous } => { init_integrity_protection(&path, continuous).await }, } } async fn validate_integrity( path: &str, format: &str, strict: bool, detailed: bool ) -> Result<(), CliError> { let framework_root = detect_framework_root()?; let implementation_root = PathBuf::from(path); let validator = IntegrityValidator::new(&framework_root, &implementation_root)?; let result = validator.validate()?; match format { "json" => println!("{}", serde_json::to_string_pretty(&result)?), "junit" => output_junit_format(&result)?, _ => output_human_format(&result, detailed)?, } if !result.passed || (strict && !result.warnings.is_empty()) { std::process::exit(1); } Ok(()) } ``` ## 🚨 Continuous Validation ### Pre-commit Hook Integration ```bash #!/bin/bash # .git/hooks/pre-commit - Framework integrity validation echo "🛡️ Running framework integrity validation..." # Run integrity check if ! cargo rustelo integrity validate --strict; then echo "❌ Framework integrity validation failed!" echo "Run 'cargo rustelo integrity repair' to attempt automatic fixes" echo "Or 'cargo rustelo integrity validate --detailed' for more information" exit 1 fi echo "✅ Framework integrity validation passed" ``` ### CI/CD Integration ```yaml # .github/workflows/integrity.yml name: Framework Integrity Check on: pull_request: branches: [main, develop] push: branches: [main, develop] jobs: integrity: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Install Rust uses: actions-rs/toolchain@v1 with: toolchain: stable - name: Install Rustelo CLI run: cargo install --path crates/templates/rustelo-cli - name: Validate Framework Integrity run: | cargo rustelo integrity validate \ --format junit \ --strict \ --detailed > integrity-results.xml - name: Upload Integrity Report uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 if: always() with: name: integrity-report path: integrity-results.xml - name: Comment PR with Integrity Issues if: failure() && github.event_name == 'pull_request' uses: actions/github-script@v6 with: script: | const fs = require('fs'); const results = fs.readFileSync('integrity-results.xml', 'utf8'); github.rest.issues.createComment({ issue_number: context.issue.number, owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, body: `## ⚠️ Framework Integrity Issues\n\`\`\`\n${results}\n\`\`\`` }); ``` ## 📋 Framework Manifest ### Core Framework Manifest ```toml # FRAMEWORK_MANIFEST.toml - Defines framework boundaries and rules [framework] name = "rustelo" version = "0.1.0" integrity_version = "1.0" compatibility_level = "stable" # Paths that are protected from direct modification [[protected_paths]] path = "crates/foundation/crates/core-lib/src/lib.rs" reason = "Core framework interface" alternatives = ["Implement traits in your own crates"] [[protected_paths]] path = "crates/foundation/crates/core-lib/src/routing/mod.rs" reason = "Core routing system" alternatives = ["Use route configuration in config/routes/"] [[protected_paths]] path = "templates/shared/" reason = "Shared template system" alternatives = ["Create local overrides in config/local/"] # Required trait implementations for compatibility [[required_traits]] trait_name = "ContentLoader" implementation_path = "src/content/loader.rs" required_methods = ["load", "validate", "cache_key"] compatibility_version = "1.0" [[required_traits]] trait_name = "RouteHandler" implementation_path = "src/routing/handlers.rs" required_methods = ["handle_request", "supports_route"] compatibility_version = "1.0" # Safe extension points [[extension_points]] name = "custom_components" location = "src/components/custom/" allowed_modifications = ["create", "modify", "delete"] description = "Custom UI components" [[extension_points]] name = "content_processors" location = "src/content/processors/" allowed_modifications = ["create", "extend"] description = "Custom content processing logic" [[extension_points]] name = "configuration_overrides" location = "config/local/" allowed_modifications = ["create", "modify"] description = "Local configuration overrides" # Patterns that break framework compatibility [[forbidden_patterns]] pattern = 'hardcoded_routes = ["/', '"/api", "/admin"]' reason = "Hardcoded routes bypass configuration system" suggested_alternative = "Use route configuration in config/routes/*.toml" severity = "Critical" [[forbidden_patterns]] pattern = "pub mod core_lib {" reason = "Direct framework core modification" suggested_alternative = "Implement traits and use extension points" severity = "Critical" [[forbidden_patterns]] pattern = "unsafe {" reason = "Unsafe code bypasses framework safety guarantees" suggested_alternative = "Use safe alternatives or request framework extension" severity = "High" [[forbidden_patterns]] pattern = 'include_str!("../../' reason = "Relative includes bypass asset system" suggested_alternative = "Use framework asset loading APIs" severity = "Medium" # Update compatibility information [update_compatibility] breaking_changes_policy = "semantic_versioning" migration_assistance = true automated_migration = ["configuration", "dependencies"] manual_migration = ["trait_signatures", "api_changes"] [validation_rules] max_compatibility_score = 0.8 # Minimum score for updates critical_violations_allowed = 0 high_violations_threshold = 3 medium_violations_threshold = 10 ``` ## 🔄 Update Safety System ### Safe Update Process ```rust /// Safe framework update system pub struct UpdateManager { current_version: String, target_version: String, integrity_validator: IntegrityValidator, } impl UpdateManager { /// Check if update is safe to apply pub fn can_update_safely(&self) -> Result { let validation_result = self.integrity_validator.validate()?; if !validation_result.passed { return Ok(UpdateSafetyReport { safe: false, reason: "Integrity violations must be resolved first".to_string(), violations: validation_result.violations, required_actions: self.generate_required_actions(&validation_result.violations), }); } let compatibility = self.check_version_compatibility()?; Ok(UpdateSafetyReport { safe: compatibility.compatible, reason: compatibility.reason, violations: Vec::new(), required_actions: compatibility.migration_steps, }) } /// Perform safe update with validation pub async fn update_safely(&mut self) -> Result { let safety_report = self.can_update_safely()?; if !safety_report.safe { return Err(UpdateError::UnsafeUpdate { reason: safety_report.reason, required_actions: safety_report.required_actions, }); } // Create backup before update self.create_backup().await?; // Apply update let result = self.apply_update().await?; // Validate post-update let post_validation = self.integrity_validator.validate()?; if !post_validation.passed { // Rollback on validation failure self.rollback().await?; return Err(UpdateError::PostUpdateValidationFailed { violations: post_validation.violations, }); } Ok(result) } } ``` ## 📊 Benefits ### For Implementation Maintainers - **Safe updates**: Never worry about breaking changes - **Clear guidance**: Know exactly what can be customized safely - **Automated validation**: Catch issues before they become problems - **Easy troubleshooting**: Clear error messages with suggested fixes ### For Framework Maintainers - **Update confidence**: Know implementations won't break - **Reduced support**: Fewer compatibility issues - **Architecture enforcement**: Ensure design principles are followed - **Quality control**: Maintain high standards across ecosystem ### For Teams - **Collaboration safety**: Multiple developers can work without breaking compatibility - **CI/CD integration**: Automated checks in development pipeline - **Knowledge sharing**: Clear documentation of what's allowed/forbidden - **Risk mitigation**: Prevent costly refactoring due to incompatible changes This comprehensive framework integrity protection system ensures that Rustelo implementations remain updateable and compatible with the core framework while providing maximum flexibility for customization through approved extension points.