152 lines
5.5 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

feat: Phase 5.3 - Multi-Agent Learning Infrastructure Implement intelligent agent learning from Knowledge Graph execution history with per-task-type expertise tracking, recency bias, and learning curves. ## Phase 5.3 Implementation ### Learning Infrastructure (✅ Complete) - LearningProfileService with per-task-type expertise metrics - TaskTypeExpertise model tracking success_rate, confidence, learning curves - Recency bias weighting: recent 7 days weighted 3x higher (exponential decay) - Confidence scoring prevents overfitting: min(1.0, executions / 20) - Learning curves computed from daily execution windows ### Agent Scoring Service (✅ Complete) - Unified AgentScore combining SwarmCoordinator + learning profiles - Scoring formula: 0.3*base + 0.5*expertise + 0.2*confidence - Rank agents by combined score for intelligent assignment - Support for recency-biased scoring (recent_success_rate) - Methods: rank_agents, select_best, rank_agents_with_recency ### KG Integration (✅ Complete) - KGPersistence::get_executions_for_task_type() - query by agent + task type - KGPersistence::get_agent_executions() - all executions for agent - Coordinator::load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG→Learning integration - Coordinator::load_all_learning_profiles() - batch load for multiple agents - Convert PersistedExecution → ExecutionData for learning calculations ### Agent Assignment Integration (✅ Complete) - AgentCoordinator uses learning profiles for task assignment - extract_task_type() infers task type from title/description - assign_task() scores candidates using AgentScoringService - Fallback to load-based selection if no learning data available - Learning profiles stored in coordinator.learning_profiles RwLock ### Profile Adapter Enhancements (✅ Complete) - create_learning_profile() - initialize empty profiles - add_task_type_expertise() - set task-type expertise - update_profile_with_learning() - update swarm profiles from learning ## Files Modified ### vapora-knowledge-graph/src/persistence.rs (+30 lines) - get_executions_for_task_type(agent_id, task_type, limit) - get_agent_executions(agent_id, limit) ### vapora-agents/src/coordinator.rs (+100 lines) - load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG integration method - load_all_learning_profiles() - batch loading for agents - assign_task() already uses learning-based scoring via AgentScoringService ### Existing Complete Implementation - vapora-knowledge-graph/src/learning.rs - calculation functions - vapora-agents/src/learning_profile.rs - data structures and expertise - vapora-agents/src/scoring.rs - unified scoring service - vapora-agents/src/profile_adapter.rs - adapter methods ## Tests Passing - learning_profile: 7 tests ✅ - scoring: 5 tests ✅ - profile_adapter: 6 tests ✅ - coordinator: learning-specific tests ✅ ## Data Flow 1. Task arrives → AgentCoordinator::assign_task() 2. Extract task_type from description 3. Query KG for task-type executions (load_learning_profile_from_kg) 4. Calculate expertise with recency bias 5. Score candidates (SwarmCoordinator + learning) 6. Assign to top-scored agent 7. Execution result → KG → Update learning profiles ## Key Design Decisions ✅ Recency bias: 7-day half-life with 3x weight for recent performance ✅ Confidence scoring: min(1.0, total_executions / 20) prevents overfitting ✅ Hierarchical scoring: 30% base load, 50% expertise, 20% confidence ✅ KG query limit: 100 recent executions per task-type for performance ✅ Async loading: load_learning_profile_from_kg supports concurrent loads ## Next: Phase 5.4 - Cost Optimization Ready to implement budget enforcement and cost-aware provider selection.
2026-01-11 13:03:53 +00:00
use crate::config::ProviderConfig;
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
/// Provider cost and efficiency score for decision making.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct ProviderCostScore {
/// Provider name (claude, gpt4, gemini, ollama)
pub provider: String,
/// Estimated cost in cents for the token count
pub estimated_cost_cents: u32,
/// Quality score (0.0-1.0) from KG success rate for task type
pub quality_score: f64,
/// Cost efficiency: (quality_score * 100) / (cost_cents + 1)
/// Prevents division by zero for Ollama (free = $0)
pub cost_efficiency: f64,
}
/// Service for ranking providers by cost efficiency.
pub struct CostRanker;
impl CostRanker {
/// Estimate cost in cents for token usage on provider.
/// Formula: (input_tokens * rate_in + output_tokens * rate_out) / 1M * 100
/// Costs are stored in dollars, converted to cents for calculation.
pub fn estimate_cost(config: &ProviderConfig, input_tokens: u64, output_tokens: u64) -> u32 {
feat: Phase 5.3 - Multi-Agent Learning Infrastructure Implement intelligent agent learning from Knowledge Graph execution history with per-task-type expertise tracking, recency bias, and learning curves. ## Phase 5.3 Implementation ### Learning Infrastructure (✅ Complete) - LearningProfileService with per-task-type expertise metrics - TaskTypeExpertise model tracking success_rate, confidence, learning curves - Recency bias weighting: recent 7 days weighted 3x higher (exponential decay) - Confidence scoring prevents overfitting: min(1.0, executions / 20) - Learning curves computed from daily execution windows ### Agent Scoring Service (✅ Complete) - Unified AgentScore combining SwarmCoordinator + learning profiles - Scoring formula: 0.3*base + 0.5*expertise + 0.2*confidence - Rank agents by combined score for intelligent assignment - Support for recency-biased scoring (recent_success_rate) - Methods: rank_agents, select_best, rank_agents_with_recency ### KG Integration (✅ Complete) - KGPersistence::get_executions_for_task_type() - query by agent + task type - KGPersistence::get_agent_executions() - all executions for agent - Coordinator::load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG→Learning integration - Coordinator::load_all_learning_profiles() - batch load for multiple agents - Convert PersistedExecution → ExecutionData for learning calculations ### Agent Assignment Integration (✅ Complete) - AgentCoordinator uses learning profiles for task assignment - extract_task_type() infers task type from title/description - assign_task() scores candidates using AgentScoringService - Fallback to load-based selection if no learning data available - Learning profiles stored in coordinator.learning_profiles RwLock ### Profile Adapter Enhancements (✅ Complete) - create_learning_profile() - initialize empty profiles - add_task_type_expertise() - set task-type expertise - update_profile_with_learning() - update swarm profiles from learning ## Files Modified ### vapora-knowledge-graph/src/persistence.rs (+30 lines) - get_executions_for_task_type(agent_id, task_type, limit) - get_agent_executions(agent_id, limit) ### vapora-agents/src/coordinator.rs (+100 lines) - load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG integration method - load_all_learning_profiles() - batch loading for agents - assign_task() already uses learning-based scoring via AgentScoringService ### Existing Complete Implementation - vapora-knowledge-graph/src/learning.rs - calculation functions - vapora-agents/src/learning_profile.rs - data structures and expertise - vapora-agents/src/scoring.rs - unified scoring service - vapora-agents/src/profile_adapter.rs - adapter methods ## Tests Passing - learning_profile: 7 tests ✅ - scoring: 5 tests ✅ - profile_adapter: 6 tests ✅ - coordinator: learning-specific tests ✅ ## Data Flow 1. Task arrives → AgentCoordinator::assign_task() 2. Extract task_type from description 3. Query KG for task-type executions (load_learning_profile_from_kg) 4. Calculate expertise with recency bias 5. Score candidates (SwarmCoordinator + learning) 6. Assign to top-scored agent 7. Execution result → KG → Update learning profiles ## Key Design Decisions ✅ Recency bias: 7-day half-life with 3x weight for recent performance ✅ Confidence scoring: min(1.0, total_executions / 20) prevents overfitting ✅ Hierarchical scoring: 30% base load, 50% expertise, 20% confidence ✅ KG query limit: 100 recent executions per task-type for performance ✅ Async loading: load_learning_profile_from_kg supports concurrent loads ## Next: Phase 5.4 - Cost Optimization Ready to implement budget enforcement and cost-aware provider selection.
2026-01-11 13:03:53 +00:00
// Convert dollar rates to cents
let input_cost_cents = config.cost_per_1m_input * 100.0;
let output_cost_cents = config.cost_per_1m_output * 100.0;
let input_total = (input_tokens as f64 * input_cost_cents) / 1_000_000.0;
let output_total = (output_tokens as f64 * output_cost_cents) / 1_000_000.0;
(input_total + output_total).round() as u32
}
/// Get quality score for provider + task type.
/// In practice, queries KG for success rate. For now, uses provided value.
pub fn get_quality_score(provider: &str, task_type: &str, _quality_data: Option<f64>) -> f64 {
// Default quality scores until KG integration provides actual metrics
match (provider, task_type) {
("claude", _) => 0.95, // Highest quality
("gpt4", _) => 0.92, // Very good
("gemini", _) => 0.88, // Good
("ollama", _) => 0.75, // Decent for local
(_, _) => 0.5, // Unknown
feat: Phase 5.3 - Multi-Agent Learning Infrastructure Implement intelligent agent learning from Knowledge Graph execution history with per-task-type expertise tracking, recency bias, and learning curves. ## Phase 5.3 Implementation ### Learning Infrastructure (✅ Complete) - LearningProfileService with per-task-type expertise metrics - TaskTypeExpertise model tracking success_rate, confidence, learning curves - Recency bias weighting: recent 7 days weighted 3x higher (exponential decay) - Confidence scoring prevents overfitting: min(1.0, executions / 20) - Learning curves computed from daily execution windows ### Agent Scoring Service (✅ Complete) - Unified AgentScore combining SwarmCoordinator + learning profiles - Scoring formula: 0.3*base + 0.5*expertise + 0.2*confidence - Rank agents by combined score for intelligent assignment - Support for recency-biased scoring (recent_success_rate) - Methods: rank_agents, select_best, rank_agents_with_recency ### KG Integration (✅ Complete) - KGPersistence::get_executions_for_task_type() - query by agent + task type - KGPersistence::get_agent_executions() - all executions for agent - Coordinator::load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG→Learning integration - Coordinator::load_all_learning_profiles() - batch load for multiple agents - Convert PersistedExecution → ExecutionData for learning calculations ### Agent Assignment Integration (✅ Complete) - AgentCoordinator uses learning profiles for task assignment - extract_task_type() infers task type from title/description - assign_task() scores candidates using AgentScoringService - Fallback to load-based selection if no learning data available - Learning profiles stored in coordinator.learning_profiles RwLock ### Profile Adapter Enhancements (✅ Complete) - create_learning_profile() - initialize empty profiles - add_task_type_expertise() - set task-type expertise - update_profile_with_learning() - update swarm profiles from learning ## Files Modified ### vapora-knowledge-graph/src/persistence.rs (+30 lines) - get_executions_for_task_type(agent_id, task_type, limit) - get_agent_executions(agent_id, limit) ### vapora-agents/src/coordinator.rs (+100 lines) - load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG integration method - load_all_learning_profiles() - batch loading for agents - assign_task() already uses learning-based scoring via AgentScoringService ### Existing Complete Implementation - vapora-knowledge-graph/src/learning.rs - calculation functions - vapora-agents/src/learning_profile.rs - data structures and expertise - vapora-agents/src/scoring.rs - unified scoring service - vapora-agents/src/profile_adapter.rs - adapter methods ## Tests Passing - learning_profile: 7 tests ✅ - scoring: 5 tests ✅ - profile_adapter: 6 tests ✅ - coordinator: learning-specific tests ✅ ## Data Flow 1. Task arrives → AgentCoordinator::assign_task() 2. Extract task_type from description 3. Query KG for task-type executions (load_learning_profile_from_kg) 4. Calculate expertise with recency bias 5. Score candidates (SwarmCoordinator + learning) 6. Assign to top-scored agent 7. Execution result → KG → Update learning profiles ## Key Design Decisions ✅ Recency bias: 7-day half-life with 3x weight for recent performance ✅ Confidence scoring: min(1.0, total_executions / 20) prevents overfitting ✅ Hierarchical scoring: 30% base load, 50% expertise, 20% confidence ✅ KG query limit: 100 recent executions per task-type for performance ✅ Async loading: load_learning_profile_from_kg supports concurrent loads ## Next: Phase 5.4 - Cost Optimization Ready to implement budget enforcement and cost-aware provider selection.
2026-01-11 13:03:53 +00:00
}
}
/// Rank providers by cost efficiency.
/// Formula: efficiency = (quality_score * 100) / (cost_cents + 1)
/// Higher efficiency = better value for money.
/// Ordered by efficiency descending (best value first).
pub fn rank_by_efficiency(
providers: Vec<(String, ProviderConfig)>,
task_type: &str,
input_tokens: u64,
output_tokens: u64,
) -> Vec<ProviderCostScore> {
let mut scores: Vec<ProviderCostScore> = providers
.into_iter()
.map(|(provider_name, config)| {
let cost = Self::estimate_cost(&config, input_tokens, output_tokens);
let quality = Self::get_quality_score(&provider_name, task_type, None);
let efficiency = (quality * 100.0) / (cost as f64 + 1.0);
ProviderCostScore {
provider: provider_name,
estimated_cost_cents: cost,
quality_score: quality,
cost_efficiency: efficiency,
}
})
.collect();
// Sort by efficiency descending (best value first)
scores.sort_by(|a, b| {
b.cost_efficiency
.partial_cmp(&a.cost_efficiency)
.unwrap_or(std::cmp::Ordering::Equal)
});
scores
}
/// Select cheapest provider when budget is tight.
/// Orders by cost ascending (cheapest first).
pub fn rank_by_cost(
providers: Vec<(String, ProviderConfig)>,
input_tokens: u64,
output_tokens: u64,
) -> Vec<ProviderCostScore> {
let mut scores: Vec<ProviderCostScore> = providers
.into_iter()
.map(|(provider_name, config)| {
let cost = Self::estimate_cost(&config, input_tokens, output_tokens);
let quality = Self::get_quality_score(&provider_name, "generic", None);
let efficiency = (quality * 100.0) / (cost as f64 + 1.0);
ProviderCostScore {
provider: provider_name,
estimated_cost_cents: cost,
quality_score: quality,
cost_efficiency: efficiency,
}
})
.collect();
// Sort by cost ascending (cheapest first)
scores.sort_by_key(|s| s.estimated_cost_cents);
scores
}
/// Calculate cost-benefit ratio for task.
/// Returns tuple: (provider, cost_cents, efficiency_score)
pub fn cost_benefit_ratio(
providers: Vec<(String, ProviderConfig)>,
task_type: &str,
input_tokens: u64,
output_tokens: u64,
) -> Vec<(String, u32, f64)> {
let ranked = Self::rank_by_efficiency(providers, task_type, input_tokens, output_tokens);
ranked
.into_iter()
.map(|score| {
(
score.provider,
score.estimated_cost_cents,
score.cost_efficiency,
)
})
feat: Phase 5.3 - Multi-Agent Learning Infrastructure Implement intelligent agent learning from Knowledge Graph execution history with per-task-type expertise tracking, recency bias, and learning curves. ## Phase 5.3 Implementation ### Learning Infrastructure (✅ Complete) - LearningProfileService with per-task-type expertise metrics - TaskTypeExpertise model tracking success_rate, confidence, learning curves - Recency bias weighting: recent 7 days weighted 3x higher (exponential decay) - Confidence scoring prevents overfitting: min(1.0, executions / 20) - Learning curves computed from daily execution windows ### Agent Scoring Service (✅ Complete) - Unified AgentScore combining SwarmCoordinator + learning profiles - Scoring formula: 0.3*base + 0.5*expertise + 0.2*confidence - Rank agents by combined score for intelligent assignment - Support for recency-biased scoring (recent_success_rate) - Methods: rank_agents, select_best, rank_agents_with_recency ### KG Integration (✅ Complete) - KGPersistence::get_executions_for_task_type() - query by agent + task type - KGPersistence::get_agent_executions() - all executions for agent - Coordinator::load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG→Learning integration - Coordinator::load_all_learning_profiles() - batch load for multiple agents - Convert PersistedExecution → ExecutionData for learning calculations ### Agent Assignment Integration (✅ Complete) - AgentCoordinator uses learning profiles for task assignment - extract_task_type() infers task type from title/description - assign_task() scores candidates using AgentScoringService - Fallback to load-based selection if no learning data available - Learning profiles stored in coordinator.learning_profiles RwLock ### Profile Adapter Enhancements (✅ Complete) - create_learning_profile() - initialize empty profiles - add_task_type_expertise() - set task-type expertise - update_profile_with_learning() - update swarm profiles from learning ## Files Modified ### vapora-knowledge-graph/src/persistence.rs (+30 lines) - get_executions_for_task_type(agent_id, task_type, limit) - get_agent_executions(agent_id, limit) ### vapora-agents/src/coordinator.rs (+100 lines) - load_learning_profile_from_kg() - core KG integration method - load_all_learning_profiles() - batch loading for agents - assign_task() already uses learning-based scoring via AgentScoringService ### Existing Complete Implementation - vapora-knowledge-graph/src/learning.rs - calculation functions - vapora-agents/src/learning_profile.rs - data structures and expertise - vapora-agents/src/scoring.rs - unified scoring service - vapora-agents/src/profile_adapter.rs - adapter methods ## Tests Passing - learning_profile: 7 tests ✅ - scoring: 5 tests ✅ - profile_adapter: 6 tests ✅ - coordinator: learning-specific tests ✅ ## Data Flow 1. Task arrives → AgentCoordinator::assign_task() 2. Extract task_type from description 3. Query KG for task-type executions (load_learning_profile_from_kg) 4. Calculate expertise with recency bias 5. Score candidates (SwarmCoordinator + learning) 6. Assign to top-scored agent 7. Execution result → KG → Update learning profiles ## Key Design Decisions ✅ Recency bias: 7-day half-life with 3x weight for recent performance ✅ Confidence scoring: min(1.0, total_executions / 20) prevents overfitting ✅ Hierarchical scoring: 30% base load, 50% expertise, 20% confidence ✅ KG query limit: 100 recent executions per task-type for performance ✅ Async loading: load_learning_profile_from_kg supports concurrent loads ## Next: Phase 5.4 - Cost Optimization Ready to implement budget enforcement and cost-aware provider selection.
2026-01-11 13:03:53 +00:00
.collect()
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_get_quality_score() {
let claude_quality = CostRanker::get_quality_score("claude", "coding", None);
assert_eq!(claude_quality, 0.95);
let ollama_quality = CostRanker::get_quality_score("ollama", "coding", None);
assert_eq!(ollama_quality, 0.75);
let unknown_quality = CostRanker::get_quality_score("unknown", "coding", None);
assert_eq!(unknown_quality, 0.5);
}
}