syntaxis/docs/databases/surrealdb/surrealdb-comparison.md

454 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# SQLite vs SurrealDB Comparison for syntaxis
## Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Feature | SQLite | SurrealDB | Advantage |
|---------|--------|-----------|-----------|
| **Type** | Relational SQL | Multi-model (Document + Graph + SQL) | SurrealDB (more flexible) |
| **Schema** | Fixed tables | Flexible/Dynamic | SurrealDB (domain-driven) |
| **Relationships** | Foreign Keys (joins) | Native Graph (edges) | SurrealDB (phase transitions) |
| **Data Format** | Row/Column | JSON Documents | SurrealDB (JSON-native) |
| **Real-time** | Polling only | WebSocket subscriptions | SurrealDB (live updates) |
| **Scalability** | Single file (embedded) | Distributed | SurrealDB (cloud-ready) |
| **Query Language** | SQL | SurrealQL (SQL-like + graph) | SurrealDB (richer) |
| **ACID** | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | Same |
| **Async Driver** | ✅ sqlx | ✅ Native | Same |
| **Versioning** | Manual (audit tables) | Built-in time-travel | SurrealDB |
| **Transactions** | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | Same |
| **JSON Support** | TEXT/JSON1 | Native | SurrealDB |
| **Setup Complexity** | Simple (file-based) | Medium (standalone server) | SQLite (easier) |
| **Operator Cost** | Low | Medium | SQLite |
---
## Query Comparison: Real-world syntaxis Scenarios
### Scenario 1: Get All Completed Tasks for a Phase
**SQLite:**
```sql
SELECT ci.*, p.name as project_name
FROM checklist_items ci
JOIN projects p ON ci.project_id = p.id
WHERE ci.phase = 'Development'
AND ci.completed = true
AND p.archived = false
ORDER BY ci.completed_at DESC
LIMIT 50;
```
**SurrealDB:**
```surql
SELECT id, task_id, description, completed_at, (->checklist_items<-projects).name as project_name
FROM checklist_items
WHERE phase = 'Development'
AND completed = true
AND !projects<-checklist_items<-projects[archived = true]
ORDER BY completed_at DESC
LIMIT 50;
```
**Verdict:** SQLite simpler, SurrealDB more flexible
---
### Scenario 2: Find All Phase Transitions for a Project (Graph Query)
**SQLite:**
```sql
-- Manual path query with JOINs
SELECT pt.*, p1.name as from_phase, p2.name as to_phase
FROM phase_transitions pt
LEFT JOIN phases p1 ON p1.id = pt.from_phase
LEFT JOIN phases p2 ON p2.id = pt.to_phase
WHERE pt.project_id = ?
ORDER BY pt.timestamp DESC;
-- Alternative: serialize in code and parse
SELECT * FROM phase_transitions WHERE project_id = ? ORDER BY timestamp DESC;
-- Then manually traverse
```
**SurrealDB:**
```surql
-- Query graph edges directly
SELECT * FROM project:123 -> transitioned_to -> *
ORDER BY time DESC;
-- Or with details
SELECT
id,
type::string(->transitioned_to) as to_phase,
reason,
timestamp
FROM project:123 -> transitioned_to;
-- Or get full path (recursive)
SELECT <- transitioned_to <- * FROM project:123;
```
**Verdict:** 🏆 **SurrealDB wins** - Natural graph traversal, no JOINs needed
---
### Scenario 3: Tool Configuration with Dynamic Fields
**SQLite:**
```sql
-- Store as JSON string
CREATE TABLE tool_configurations (
id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
project_id TEXT,
tool_name TEXT,
config_json TEXT, -- {"rust_version": "1.75", "clippy_level": "pedantic", ...}
...
);
-- Retrieve and parse in Rust
let result = sqlx::query!(
"SELECT config_json FROM tool_configurations WHERE id = ?",
id
).fetch_one(&pool).await?;
let config: serde_json::Value = serde_json::from_str(&result.config_json)?;
let rust_version = config["rust_version"].as_str();
```
**SurrealDB:**
```surql
-- Native document storage
CREATE toolconfig:cargo-clippy SET
tool_name = 'cargo-clippy',
enabled = true,
config = {
rust_version: '1.75',
clippy_level: 'pedantic',
lint_rules: ['all', 'pedantic'],
exclude_rules: ['unsafe-code'],
},
updated_at = now();
-- Query fields directly
SELECT config.rust_version FROM toolconfig:cargo-clippy;
-- Update nested fields
UPDATE toolconfig:cargo-clippy SET
config.clippy_level = 'strict'
config.updated_at = now();
```
**Verdict:** 🏆 **SurrealDB wins** - Type-safe nested documents, no string parsing
---
### Scenario 4: Audit Trail - "Show me what changed"
**SQLite:**
```sql
-- Need separate activity_logs table
CREATE TABLE activity_logs (
id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
project_id TEXT,
table_name TEXT,
action TEXT, -- 'INSERT', 'UPDATE', 'DELETE'
before_data TEXT,
after_data TEXT,
timestamp TEXT,
user_id TEXT
);
-- Query changes
SELECT * FROM activity_logs
WHERE project_id = ?
AND table_name = 'projects'
AND timestamp BETWEEN ? AND ?
ORDER BY timestamp DESC;
-- Manually compare before/after
let before = serde_json::from_str(&result.before_data)?;
let after = serde_json::from_str(&result.after_data)?;
let diff = compute_diff(before, after);
```
**SurrealDB:**
```surql
-- Built-in version control
-- Query project state at specific time
SELECT * FROM projects VERSION AT <d'2025-01-14T10:00:00Z'>;
-- See what changed between times
SELECT * FROM projects
DIFF FROM <d'2025-01-14T10:00:00Z'>
TO <d'2025-01-15T10:00:00Z'>;
-- See all versions
SELECT * FROM projects VERSIONS;
-- Automatic - no manual audit tables needed!
```
**Verdict:** 🏆 **SurrealDB wins** - Built-in versioning, no manual tracking
---
### Scenario 5: Real-time Dashboard Updates
**SQLite:**
```rust
// Polling approach (bad for real-time)
let mut interval = tokio::time::interval(Duration::from_secs(5));
loop {
interval.tick().await;
let projects = sqlx::query_as::<_, Project>(
"SELECT * FROM projects WHERE updated_at > ?"
)
.bind(&last_update)
.fetch_all(&pool)
.await?;
// Send to dashboard...
send_to_dashboard(projects).await;
last_update = Utc::now();
}
```
**SurrealDB:**
```rust
// WebSocket subscription (real-time push)
let mut stream = db.query("LIVE SELECT * FROM projects")
.await?
.take(0)?;
// Automatically gets PUSH notifications for ANY change
while let Some(change) = stream.next().await {
match change {
Ok(notification) => {
// Instant notification of change
send_to_dashboard(notification).await;
}
Err(e) => eprintln!("Subscription error: {}", e),
}
}
```
**Verdict:** 🏆 **SurrealDB wins** - Built-in WebSocket subscriptions, real-time push vs polling
---
### Scenario 6: Complex Filter - Uncompleted Tasks in Active Projects
**SQLite:**
```sql
SELECT ci.*
FROM checklist_items ci
JOIN projects p ON ci.project_id = p.id
WHERE ci.completed = false
AND p.archived = false
AND p.current_phase IN ('Development', 'Testing')
AND ci.phase = p.current_phase
ORDER BY ci.task_priority DESC,
CASE
WHEN ci.task_due IS NULL THEN 1
ELSE 0
END,
ci.task_due ASC;
```
**SurrealDB:**
```surql
SELECT * FROM checklist_items
WHERE
completed = false
AND (->projects<-checklist_items).archived = false
AND (->projects<-checklist_items).current_phase = phase
AND (->projects<-checklist_items).current_phase IN ['Development', 'Testing']
ORDER BY
task_priority DESC,
task_due ASC NULLS LAST;
```
**Verdict:** Roughly equivalent, SurrealDB graph relations slightly more natural
---
## Performance Comparison
### Read Performance (Queries)
```
Simple Select Complex Join Graph Traversal
SQLite ✅✅✅ Very Fast ✅✅ Good ⚠️ Slow (many JOINs)
SurrealDB ✅✅ Fast ✅✅ Good ✅✅✅ Excellent
```
### Write Performance (Inserts)
```
Single Insert Batch Insert Transaction
SQLite ✅✅✅ Very Fast ✅✅ Good ✅✅ Good
SurrealDB ✅✅ Good ✅✅ Good ✅✅ Good
```
### Real-time Updates
```
Polling Push Notification
SQLite ⚠️ Expensive ✗ Not possible
SurrealDB ✗ Not needed ✅✅✅ Excellent
```
---
## Cost Analysis
### Operational Complexity
**SQLite:**
- ✅ File-based, no server to run
- ✅ Zero configuration
- ✅ Single process
- ✅ Backup = copy file
**SurrealDB:**
- ⚠️ Standalone server process
- ⚠️ Minimal configuration needed
- ⚠️ Network communication (WebSocket/HTTP)
- ✅ Cloud-native deployment
### Learning Curve
**SQLite:**
- ✅ Standard SQL
- ✅ Familiar to most developers
- ✅ Excellent documentation
**SurrealDB:**
- ⚠️ New query language (SurrealQL)
- ⚠️ Graph concepts (edges, relations)
- ⚠️ Fewer examples available
### Migration Effort
**Switching from SQLite to SurrealDB:**
1. Define Database trait (4-6 hours)
2. Refactor SQLite to adapter (6-8 hours)
3. Implement SurrealDB adapter (12-16 hours)
4. Data migration (4-6 hours)
5. Testing & validation (8-10 hours)
6. **Total: ~40-50 hours** (1 developer-week)
---
## Recommendation Matrix
### Use SQLite if:
- ✅ Single-user or small team
- ✅ Embedded deployment (CLI tool, local only)
- ✅ Minimal operational overhead desired
- ✅ Simple relational data model
- ✅ Fast MVP/PoC needed
- ✅ Budget constrained
**Current Status:** ✅ **syntaxis uses SQLite**
### Use SurrealDB if:
- ✅ Multi-user collaborative environment
- ✅ Complex relationships (phases, tasks, dependencies)
- ✅ Real-time updates required
- ✅ Distributed/cloud deployment
- ✅ Graph queries common
- ✅ Audit trail important
**Why SurrealDB fits syntaxis:**
1. **Graph-native phases** - Transitions are natural edges
2. **Complex relationships** - Task dependencies, project relationships
3. **Real-time dashboard** - TUI/Web dashboard updates
4. **Flexible schema** - Tool configs, extensible design
5. **Future-proof** - Scales to enterprise
---
## Migration Path
### Current (Recommended)
```
syntaxis
├── persistence.rs (SQLite only)
├── config.toml (engine: "sqlite")
└── workspace.db (embedded)
```
### Phase 1 (Add Trait)
```
syntaxis
├── persistence/
│ ├── mod.rs (Database trait)
│ ├── sqlite_impl.rs (current code)
│ └── error.rs
├── config.toml (engine: "sqlite")
└── workspace.db
```
### Phase 2 (Add SurrealDB Support)
```
syntaxis
├── persistence/
│ ├── mod.rs (Database trait)
│ ├── sqlite_impl.rs
│ ├── surrealdb_impl.rs (NEW)
│ └── error.rs
├── config.toml (engine: "sqlite" OR "surrealdb")
└── workspace.db / surrealdb-server
```
### Phase 3 (Recommendation for Enterprise)
```
syntaxis
├── persistence/
│ ├── mod.rs (Database trait)
│ ├── sqlite_impl.rs (default)
│ ├── surrealdb_impl.rs (advanced)
│ ├── postgres_impl.rs (future)
│ └── error.rs
├── configs/
│ ├── sqlite.toml (embedded)
│ ├── surrealdb.toml (cloud-ready)
│ └── postgres.toml (enterprise)
└── docker-compose.yml (SurrealDB + PostgreSQL)
```
---
## Final Recommendation
| Scenario | Recommendation | Reason |
|----------|---|---|
| **Development** | SQLite | No setup, fast iteration |
| **Single User** | SQLite | No overhead needed |
| **Small Team** | SQLite | Still manageable |
| **Large Team** | SurrealDB | Real-time, graph queries |
| **Cloud Deployment** | SurrealDB | Distributed, scalable |
| **Enterprise** | SurrealDB + PostgreSQL | Choice, backup options |
**For syntaxis:**
- **Keep SQLite as default** (current)
- **Add SurrealDB support** in Phase 2 (next quarter)
- **Let users choose** via configuration
- **No breaking changes** with trait-based design
---
## References
- SQLite Docs: https://sqlite.org/
- SurrealDB Docs: https://surrealdb.com/docs
- SurrealDB Rust Client: https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb.rs
- Example Code: See `SURREALDB_EXAMPLE.rs` in this directory