The full scope across this batch: POST /sessions key→token exchange, SessionStore dual-index with revoke_by_id, CLI Bearer injection (ONTOREF_TOKEN), ontoref setup --gen-keys, install scripts, daemon config form roundtrip, ADR-004/005, on+re self-description update (fully-self-described), and landing page refresh.
886 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
886 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
# Rustikon 2026 - Live Reader Script (Speech Only)
|
||
|
||
Only lines to speak. Legend: `/` short pause, `//` long pause.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 1
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 1 - Hook & Promise
|
||
TENSION: Low -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Credibilidad y dolor real
|
||
DELIVERY: Calma, pausas limpias
|
||
|
||
Why I Needed Rust
|
||
|
||
Finally. / infra Automation I Can Sleep On
|
||
|
||
## Slide 2
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 1 - Hook & Promise
|
||
TENSION: Low -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Credibilidad y dolor real
|
||
DELIVERY: Calma, pausas limpias
|
||
|
||
Years. / One Problem.
|
||
|
||
Era Tool Lesson
|
||
|
||
1990s Perl Power without safety is a disaster
|
||
|
||
2000s Python practical work without safety rules is fragile
|
||
|
||
2010s Bash · Chef · Ansible · Terraform More tools don't solve approach problems
|
||
|
||
2020s Go · ???
|
||
|
||
Each time. / I thought I had the answer.
|
||
|
||
Each time. / reality proved me wrong.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 3
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 1 - Hook & Promise
|
||
TENSION: Low -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Credibilidad y dolor real
|
||
DELIVERY: Calma, pausas limpias
|
||
|
||
The Evolution
|
||
|
||
How we got here
|
||
|
||
## Slide 4
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 2 - Escalation
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Crecimiento de complejidad sin control
|
||
DELIVERY: Ritmo creciente
|
||
|
||
Stage 1. / Local (late 80s / early 90s)
|
||
|
||
Dumb terminals. / Single machine. / One state.
|
||
|
||
Local development. / long deployment cycles. / low urgency
|
||
|
||
One state. / easy to observe. / easy to control
|
||
|
||
I A C: procedural scripts. / logic hidden inside the application
|
||
|
||
> The Perl Era: we could do anything.
|
||
|
||
> We could also break anything.
|
||
|
||
> Beautiful. / terrifying metaprogramming.
|
||
|
||
> No safety net.
|
||
|
||
> Silent failures at 3 AM.
|
||
|
||
> Lesson: power without safety is a disaster.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●○ 😴 ●●●●○ 🔥 ●○○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 5
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 2 - Escalation
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Crecimiento de complejidad sin control
|
||
DELIVERY: Ritmo creciente
|
||
|
||
Stage 2. / Networks / Internet
|
||
|
||
Systems getting farther away. / More people. / More coordination.
|
||
|
||
Remote access. / spread out teams. / security becomes relevant
|
||
|
||
Cost of downtime rises. / processes become critical
|
||
|
||
Harmonizing: package installs. / config. / updates across multiple machines in parallel
|
||
|
||
I A C: reproducible automation. / first declared attempts
|
||
|
||
> The Python Era: rapid development. / great community.
|
||
|
||
> But nothing stopped you from being wrong.
|
||
|
||
> Type hints came late. / and optional.
|
||
|
||
> Runtime errors >> compile-time errors.
|
||
|
||
> Lesson: practical work without safety rules is fragile.
|
||
|
||
More pieces. / More people. / Getting interesting.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●○○ 😴 ●●●○○ 🔥 ●●○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 6
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 2 - Escalation
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Crecimiento de complejidad sin control
|
||
DELIVERY: Ritmo creciente
|
||
|
||
Stage 3. / Containers / Cloud / CI-CD
|
||
|
||
Everything. / Everywhere. / All at once.
|
||
|
||
Monolith → spread out. / all day. / every day. / high availability
|
||
|
||
Cloud. / hybrid. / multi-cloud. / on-prem. / simultaneously
|
||
|
||
Rollback and rollforward: database transactions. / but for infra
|
||
|
||
Scale horizontally AND vertically. / and descale
|
||
|
||
C I slash C D continuous: new features. / new deploys. / permanent churn
|
||
|
||
> The Cloud/I A C Era: Ansible. / Terraform. / Chef. / Puppet.
|
||
|
||
> What changed? The syntax.
|
||
|
||
> What didn't? The fundamental problems.
|
||
|
||
> Still fighting type safety. / Still discovering errors in production.
|
||
|
||
> Lesson: more tools don't solve approach problems.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●○○○ 😴 ●○○○○ 🔥 ●●●●○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 7
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 2 - Escalation
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Crecimiento de complejidad sin control
|
||
DELIVERY: Ritmo creciente
|
||
|
||
I could automate infra.
|
||
|
||
But I couldn't make it reliable.
|
||
|
||
I couldn't prevent mistakes.
|
||
|
||
I couldn't sleep.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●○○○○ 😴 ○○○○○ 🔥 ●●●●●
|
||
|
||
## Slide 8
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
Why I A C Fails
|
||
|
||
The restaurant problem
|
||
|
||
## Slide 9
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
The Restaurant
|
||
|
||
Every restaurant has at least three actors.
|
||
|
||
Restaurant infra
|
||
|
||
Guest declares what they want declared config (YAML. / HCL)
|
||
|
||
Waiter validates and transmits controller (K8s. / Ansible)
|
||
|
||
Kitchen executes and delivers Runtime / setup
|
||
|
||
Dish arrives. / or doesn't Deployment succeeds. / or not
|
||
|
||
What makes it work. / or not:
|
||
|
||
The guest declares. / Doesn't implement.
|
||
|
||
The waiter must know what's possible. / before going to the kitchen.
|
||
|
||
> "I want X" → waiter goes to kitchen
|
||
|
||
> → "we don't have X. / why is it on the menu?"
|
||
|
||
> → back to the table.
|
||
|
||
> Equivalent: I configured a host with port 8443 → that port isn't allowed → reconfigure from zero.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 10
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
The Truth That Mutates
|
||
|
||
State is not static. / It can change at every step of the chain.
|
||
|
||
Step Truth for this actor
|
||
|
||
Guest speaks What they want
|
||
|
||
Waiter's notepad What was written down
|
||
|
||
Kitchen markings What's done / not done
|
||
|
||
Payment ticket What was actually served
|
||
|
||
> Fail early = fail cheap. / Fail in production = nightmare.
|
||
|
||
The context problem:
|
||
|
||
The waiter knows the regular customer: "always no salt."
|
||
|
||
The kitchen doesn't. / If the waiter changes. / that context disappears.
|
||
|
||
config drift is the same thing: Implicit state. / Not explicit. / Not propagated. / Lost silently.
|
||
|
||
The cost of failure depends on where it happens:
|
||
|
||
Fail at the table (impossible order): cheap. / caught before kitchen
|
||
|
||
Fail in kitchen (ingredient missing): medium. / renegotiate with guest
|
||
|
||
Fail at delivery (wrong dish arrives): expensive. / experience destroyed
|
||
|
||
## Slide 11
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
"We Don't Have Mushrooms"
|
||
|
||
When an actor in the chain can't fulfill part of the order.
|
||
|
||
> "Can I substitute vegetables?"
|
||
|
||
> That renegotiation must be explicit. / Traced. / Re-authorized. / Not silent. / Not assumed.
|
||
|
||
config drift is silent renegotiation:
|
||
|
||
The system changes. / Nobody notified. / State diverges without trace.
|
||
|
||
Rust's answer. / Option :
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
> The compiler check is the waiter who cannot pretend an ingredient exists.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 12
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
The Config Evolution
|
||
|
||
How we got from code to YAML hell
|
||
|
||
Hardcoded. / everything inside the binary. / Full control. / Zero flexibility.
|
||
|
||
External config (JSON). / works between machines. / Unreadable for humans at scale.
|
||
|
||
YAML / TOML. / more readable. / Fragile syntax. / Implicit types. / Silent errors.
|
||
|
||
YAML + Serde. / Serde validates the structure:
|
||
|
||
Does the field exist? Is it the right type?
|
||
|
||
Do we accept "elephant" as a pet? If the type is String... / yes.
|
||
|
||
Serde validates shape. / Not meaning.
|
||
|
||
Helm / Jinja templates. / YAML generated from variables (in YAML).
|
||
|
||
Does it validate the content of the generated YAML? No. / Not at all.
|
||
|
||
Like using an LLM with a markdown reference: the format is there.
|
||
|
||
but is the content correct? Nobody safety rules that.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 13
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
Continuous C I slash C D.
|
||
|
||
No semantic check.
|
||
|
||
Continuous hope.
|
||
|
||
(crossing our fingers in production)
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●○○○○ 😴 ○○○○○ 🔥 ●●●●●
|
||
|
||
## Slide 14
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 3 - Problem Anatomy
|
||
TENSION: High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Causa raiz y costo de fallar tarde
|
||
DELIVERY: Didactico, frases cortas
|
||
|
||
Three Questions Without Answers
|
||
|
||
Question 1 —
|
||
|
||
— Why do we wait for things to break?
|
||
|
||
"Works on my machine". / in production. / I don't know
|
||
|
||
Fail late = maximum cost. / We want: fail fast. / fail cheap
|
||
|
||
Question 2 —
|
||
|
||
— Do we actually know what we want?
|
||
|
||
Is the declaration sufficient and consistent with what's possible?
|
||
|
||
What are the boundaries? Static or dynamic? What is the source of truth. / and when does it mutate?
|
||
|
||
Question 3 —
|
||
|
||
Can we guarantee determinism ?
|
||
|
||
C I slash C D without semantic check = continuous hope
|
||
|
||
We want certainty. / not randomness
|
||
|
||
"Works on my machine" cannot be the production standard
|
||
|
||
> We're not inventing anything new. / Everything already exists.
|
||
|
||
> The question is whether we're managing it correctly.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 15
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 4 - Turning Point
|
||
TENSION: Peak
|
||
EMPHASIS: No faltan tools, falta paradigma
|
||
DELIVERY: Silencios intencionales
|
||
|
||
The tools weren't the problem.
|
||
|
||
The languages weren't the problem.
|
||
|
||
The approach was the problem.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 16
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 4 - Turning Point
|
||
TENSION: Peak
|
||
EMPHASIS: No faltan tools, falta paradigma
|
||
DELIVERY: Silencios intencionales
|
||
|
||
Systems we don't know how to control.
|
||
|
||
We hope they work.
|
||
|
||
When they don't. / we fix them.
|
||
|
||
Continuous nightmare.
|
||
|
||
( alarm state as the new normal)
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●○○○○ 😴 ○○○○○ 🔥 ●●●●●
|
||
|
||
## Slide 17
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 4 - Turning Point
|
||
TENSION: Peak
|
||
EMPHASIS: No faltan tools, falta paradigma
|
||
DELIVERY: Silencios intencionales
|
||
|
||
Rust
|
||
|
||
The answer to all three questions
|
||
|
||
## Slide 18
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 4 - Turning Point
|
||
TENSION: Peak
|
||
EMPHASIS: No faltan tools, falta paradigma
|
||
DELIVERY: Silencios intencionales
|
||
|
||
The Bridge: From Serde to Types
|
||
|
||
Serde loads structurally valid config.
|
||
|
||
But "elephant" as pet: String compiles.
|
||
|
||
Rust's answer: don't use String. / Use a type.
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
This is the shift.:
|
||
|
||
Not the config format. / The model of what it can contain.
|
||
|
||
Serde validates shape Types validate meaning
|
||
|
||
The compiler check validates before the binary exists.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 19
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 5 - Resolution
|
||
TENSION: High -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Types y compiler como respuesta
|
||
DELIVERY: Claro y tecnico
|
||
|
||
What Rust Gives Us
|
||
|
||
Answer to Question 1: fail early. / fail cheap
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Answer to Question 2: explicit contracts
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
## Slide 20
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 5 - Resolution
|
||
TENSION: High -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Types y compiler como respuesta
|
||
DELIVERY: Claro y tecnico
|
||
|
||
The compiler check as Pre-Validator
|
||
|
||
Answer to Question 3:
|
||
|
||
guaranteed determinism
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
The compiler check validates:
|
||
|
||
Before building the binary
|
||
|
||
Not after hours of execution
|
||
|
||
Not when a function nobody touched in months finally gets called
|
||
|
||
Predictable behavior: memory. / resources. / workflows
|
||
|
||
The compiler check is the waiter who validates the order.
|
||
|
||
Before it reaches the kitchen.
|
||
|
||
Before the guest waits.
|
||
|
||
Before any ingredient is missing.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●○ 😴 ●●●●○ 🔥 ●●○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 21
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 5 - Resolution
|
||
TENSION: High -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Types y compiler como respuesta
|
||
DELIVERY: Claro y tecnico
|
||
|
||
The Human Impact
|
||
|
||
When the system is trustworthy:
|
||
|
||
✓ Sleep comes back
|
||
|
||
✓ Confidence returns
|
||
|
||
✓ The team trusts the automation
|
||
|
||
✓ Stress decreases
|
||
|
||
✓ You can actually rest
|
||
|
||
> What you can't measure: fear .
|
||
|
||
> What you can measure: MTTR .
|
||
|
||
> Before: > 30 minutes. / Now: .
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●● 😴 ●●●●● 🔥 ●○○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 22
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 5 - Resolution
|
||
TENSION: High -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Types y compiler como respuesta
|
||
DELIVERY: Claro y tecnico
|
||
|
||
Continuous C I slash C D.
|
||
|
||
Types. / compiler check. / Explicit state.
|
||
|
||
Continuous certainty.
|
||
|
||
(to keep sleeping well)
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●● 😴 ●●●●● 🔥 ●○○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 23
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 5 - Resolution
|
||
TENSION: High -> Medium
|
||
EMPHASIS: Types y compiler como respuesta
|
||
DELIVERY: Claro y tecnico
|
||
|
||
In Production
|
||
|
||
This is not theory
|
||
|
||
## Slide 24 (name: provisioning)
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
import { ref. / computed } from 'vue'
|
||
|
||
const useWhite = ref(false)
|
||
|
||
const bgStyle = computed(() => ({
|
||
|
||
backgroundImage: url('${useWhite.value ? "/w-arch-diag-v2.svg" : "/arch-diag-v2.svg"}').
|
||
|
||
backgroundSize: 'contain'.
|
||
|
||
backgroundRepeat: 'no-repeat'.
|
||
|
||
backgroundPosition: 'center'.
|
||
|
||
position: 'absolute'.
|
||
|
||
inset: '0'.
|
||
|
||
cursor: 'pointer'.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 25
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Nickel
|
||
|
||
YAML rejected. / TOML rejected. / Reason: no type safety.
|
||
|
||
YAML wrote what we wanted.
|
||
|
||
It couldn't say what was possible.
|
||
|
||
Nickel closes that gap
|
||
|
||
— at config time. / not at 3 AM.
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Typed Source of Truth
|
||
|
||
Result (ADR-003): zero config type errors in production.
|
||
|
||
Config hierarchy:
|
||
|
||
defaults → workspace → profile → environment → runtime
|
||
|
||
Each layer merges.
|
||
|
||
Type system catches conflicts.
|
||
|
||
At config time. / not deployment time.
|
||
|
||
The guest wrote an impossible order.
|
||
|
||
Nickel makes impossible orders unwritable.
|
||
|
||
> Serde validates shape.
|
||
|
||
> Nickel validates meaning.
|
||
|
||
> The compiler check validates before deployment.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 26
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Traits as Provider
|
||
|
||
The kitchen can change. / AWS ≠ UpCloud ≠ bare metal. / Same menu.
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Explicit state. / no drift:
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Contracts
|
||
|
||
Checkpoint every 5 minutes
|
||
|
||
No implicit state.
|
||
|
||
> No "the waiter remembers the customer doesn't want salt."
|
||
|
||
It's in the order. / Always. / Explicit.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 27
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Dependency Graph
|
||
|
||
Failfast: bool is not a config option.
|
||
|
||
It's a principle encoded as a type.
|
||
|
||
Typed DAG. / dependency resolution enforced at workflow compile time:
|
||
|
||
The kitchen doesn't serve the main course before the starter is done.
|
||
|
||
DependencyType::Hard is that rule. / In the type system. / not in a runbook.
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Fail Fast. / Fail Cheap
|
||
|
||
DependencyType::Hard - failure stops the chain. / Always.
|
||
|
||
DependencyType::Soft - continues. / explicitly degraded.
|
||
|
||
DependencyType::Optional - missing is expected and fine.
|
||
|
||
> The compiler check catches the install order.
|
||
|
||
> Not the on-call engineer at 2 AM.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●● 😴 ●●●●● 🔥 ●○○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 28
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Real Applications
|
||
|
||
## Kubernetes
|
||
|
||
The controller provisions cluster components as a typed workflow:
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Each dependency is a DependencyType.
|
||
|
||
The compiler check catches: installing Cilium without Kubernetes.
|
||
|
||
Not the on-call engineer at 2 AM.
|
||
|
||
>"In my machine it works" has a price here.
|
||
|
||
> This is the highest-stakes infra in the deck.
|
||
|
||
## Blockchain Validators
|
||
|
||
Validators require brutal uptime.
|
||
|
||
A validator that fails loses funds. / not your infra's money.
|
||
|
||
Your customer's.
|
||
|
||
Post-quantum cryptography: CRYSTALS-Kyber + Falcon + AES-256-GCM hybrid. / Validator keys protected against quantum computers.
|
||
|
||
SLOs with real error budgets: 99.99% = 52.6 min downtime/year. / Prometheus blocks deploys when burn rate exceeds budget.
|
||
|
||
Deterministic config: validator parameters are types. / A bondamount that isn't a valid u128 doesn't compile.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 29
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Disaster Recovery
|
||
|
||
Rollback as a type. / not a procedure
|
||
|
||
3 AM. / Something broke. / You need to rollback.
|
||
|
||
Without types: you improvise.
|
||
|
||
With types: you choose a strategy
|
||
|
||
— or it doesn't compile.
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
Multi-backend backup: restic. / borg. / tar. / rsync
|
||
|
||
— all as enum variants.
|
||
|
||
Production backup and DR restore use the same type. / the same schema.
|
||
|
||
> The runbook exists.
|
||
|
||
> Nobody reads it clearly at 3 AM under pressure.
|
||
|
||
> The type forces the decision before the crisis.
|
||
|
||
> The state is the same in prod and in DR. / Always.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 30
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Self-Healing
|
||
|
||
> When something breaks at 3 AM
|
||
|
||
>. / the system responds. / not you.
|
||
|
||
[code example]
|
||
|
||
— Typed Remediation
|
||
|
||
What happens at 3 AM:
|
||
|
||
Alert fires → RemediationEngine matches condition → runs RestartService
|
||
|
||
Works: silent. / Nobody woken up.
|
||
|
||
Fails 3×: page sent. / with full state. / checkpoint. / and execution history.
|
||
|
||
> You wake up to information. / Not to chaos.
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●● 😴 ●●●●● 🔥 ●○○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 31
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 6 - Proof in Production
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> High
|
||
EMPHASIS: Casos reales e impacto operativo
|
||
DELIVERY: Energetico y concreto
|
||
|
||
Without types. / Without compiler check. / Without explicit state.
|
||
|
||
MTTR > 30 minutes.
|
||
|
||
Rust. / Types. / Explicit state.
|
||
|
||
Automated response.
|
||
|
||
MTTR (at 3 AM. / without you.)
|
||
|
||
🛡 ●●●●● 😴 ●●●●● 🔥 ●○○○○
|
||
|
||
## Slide 32
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 7 - Close & CTA
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> Low
|
||
EMPHASIS: Cierre emocional con accion
|
||
DELIVERY: Lento y memorable
|
||
|
||
Why This Matters
|
||
|
||
For everyone in this room
|
||
|
||
## Slide 33
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 7 - Close & CTA
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> Low
|
||
EMPHASIS: Cierre emocional con accion
|
||
DELIVERY: Lento y memorable
|
||
|
||
For You
|
||
|
||
If you've been frustrated like me
|
||
|
||
Rust solves problems you already have.
|
||
|
||
This is not hype. / It is operational relief.
|
||
|
||
Start here:
|
||
|
||
Model your infra as types
|
||
|
||
Let the compiler check pre-validate before deployment
|
||
|
||
If you're earlier in your career
|
||
|
||
Start with type safety from day one.
|
||
|
||
Build for stable work. / not only speed.
|
||
|
||
The shortest path:
|
||
|
||
Types for config.
|
||
|
||
Traits for providers.
|
||
|
||
Determinism for operations.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 34
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 7 - Close & CTA
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> Low
|
||
EMPHASIS: Cierre emocional con accion
|
||
DELIVERY: Lento y memorable
|
||
|
||
I have perspective from long production experience.
|
||
|
||
I have seen technologies come and go.
|
||
|
||
Rust is not hype. / Rust is relief with evidence.
|
||
|
||
It solves real operational problems I had for decades.
|
||
|
||
More years is not a liability.
|
||
|
||
It is an advantage.
|
||
|
||
## Slide 35 (name: end)
|
||
|
||
STORY: Act 7 - Close & CTA
|
||
TENSION: Medium -> Low
|
||
EMPHASIS: Cierre emocional con accion
|
||
DELIVERY: Lento y memorable
|
||
|
||
Why I Needed Rust
|
||
|
||
Three Closing Lines
|
||
|
||
I have lived this problem for decades.
|
||
|
||
Rust gave me deterministic systems and better sleep.
|
||
|
||
Start small: model infra as types.
|
||
|
||
Thank you. / Questions?
|
||
|
||
More info:
|
||
|
||
· jesusperez.pro
|
||
|
||
· setup.systems · vapora.dev · rustelo.dev
|
||
|